The History of Islam

Copyright© 2016-2017


Home Page ACTS OF TERROR Faith of Islam Sex Slavery is Islam Islam Variations Islam and Wahhabi Islam Pillars Muhammed and his Wives Muhammed and his Wars Islam and non Muslims Islam and Women Islam and violence Islam and Homosexuality Islam and Crime Islam and Rape Islam and Stoning Education and Charity QATAR PAKISTAN MADRASSES Saudi Yemen

القرآن الكريم عربي

Thanks to all those that have provided Relevant texts and verse for this site to direct to

No spelling corrections or changes have been made to text, as these are as found in originals.

As described by the words of Muhammad (pbuh) in the Quran, non believers are

"the vilest of animals" and "losers"

Is Islam a religion or movement?

The religion of Islam is one of the most modern of popular faiths,  being founded by Muhammed, a military leader in the 7th century

Many critics and historians comment that it was founded at the end of a sword and hardly a religion of love, peace and tolerance. This view is indeed confirmed every single day as Muslim have been killing Muslim, not in the name of politics or tribalism, but in the name of their god and Islam itself.

Others point to established religions of Judaism, Hinduism and Budism, all established well before the birth of even Christianity.

There is great disagreement between the various factions of Islam, sufficient enough for them to kill one another. The religion is also one of great intolerance, holding laws of a barbaric bygone age of the 7th century, by which to live in the 21st century.

This is a non biased account of The history of Islam based on known facts

The life of Muhammed by years

Born into the Banu Hashim clan which was a prominent Mecca family and part of the Quraysh tribe.

His father died 6 months before his birth.

It is unknown where he lived during childhood before the age of 6, as there are several versions, some clearly written to  fit the alternative story. It is known that the fortunes of his clan had diminished and that weaker members were merely kept from starvation, especially in the 6th century.

Little is known of Muhammad during his later youth, available information is fragmented, causing difficulty to separate history from legend.

The spelling in non Arabic, of the prophet’s name has never been agreed upon, being Muhammed or Muhammad or Mohammed or Mohammad and many more. No disrespect is given

570 - Born in Mecca

576 - Orphaned upon death of mother

595 - Marries Kadijah - older, wealthy widow

610 - Reports first revelations at age of 40

619 - Protector uncle dies

622 - Emigrates from Mecca to Medina (the Hijra)

623 - Orders raids on Meccan caravans

624 - Battle of Badr (victory)

624 - Evicts Qaynuqa Jews from Medina

624 - Orders assassination of Abu Afak

624 - Orders assassination of Asma bint Marwan

624 - Orders the assassination of Ka'b al-Ashraf

625 - Battle of Uhud (defeated)

625 - Evicts Nadir Jews

627 - Battle of the Trench (victory)

627 - Massacre of the Qurayza Jews

628 - Signing of the Treaty of Hudaibiya with Mecca

628 - Destruction and subjugation of the Khaybar Jews

629 - Orders first raid into Christian lands at Muta (defeat)

630 - Conquers Mecca by surprise (along with other tribes)

631 - Leads second raid into Christian territory at Tabuk (no battle)

632 - Dies

Muhammed_Islam_emblemIslam has, via their written book the Quran, it is claimed, been funded by the Saudi Arabia to include inflammatory sections and verses aimed at non Muslims in order to flame hatred.

Resulting in TWO versions of the holy book, one as the standard and one as the ‘in house’ read read and followed, to be kept away from outsiders.

The Saudis have denied the accusations made firstly in the 1980’s.

However, because the Quran is so easily reprinted without set text, it is easy for the Quran to be used to back any forms of terrorism and hatred. Any criticism of the Saudis or suggestions that they are guilty of this action, will result in threats to trade and aid support.

Faith of ISLAM


Holy Qu’ran


The History of Islam is based upon 3 different sources

Previous Scriptures - According to Islam -  Secular History


The Prophet Muhammad is credited by the faith as being the founder of Islam. However, for devout Muslims, Islam actually began before Muhammad ever dictated the Quran to be written.

However, according to the Quran, it did not originate with Muhammad, but with the Quran itself testifying that it was given by God through the angel Gabriel to the prophet Muhammad (chicken and egg as some Scholars have said).

(Sura 26:192-195) "This is a revelation from the Lord of the universe. The Honest Spirit (Gabriel) came down with it, to reveal it into your heart that you may be one of the warners, in a perfect Arabic tongue"

 (Sura 2:97) “Say, 'Anyone who opposes Gabriel should know that he has brought down (Quran) this into your heart, in accordance with God's will, confirming previous scriptures, and providing guidance and good news for the believers”.


 The to be claimed prophet Muhammad (570-632 A.D.) claimed to have been visited by the Angel Gabriel who told Muhammad what should be written into the to become Holy book of the Quran. The History of Islam therefore is set in most views as this being the nearest to the truth of why the Quran was written. Muslims believe the Quran therefore to be the preexistent, perfect words of Allah.


The "previous scriptures" refer to the Hebrew Torah, the Psalms of David, and the Gospels of Jesus Christ (Sura 4:163; 5:44-48).

The Quran accepts these books as divinely inspired and even encourages us to test its claims.

"If you have any doubt regarding what is revealed to you from your Lord, then ask those who read the previous scripture" (Sura 10:94).

However, this is but one point where the Quran starts to contradict these Scriptures which it claims to support.  As one example the Quran explicitly denies Jesus Christ ever being crucified! (Sura 4:157-158)

According to the Hebrew Torah, God made a covenant with a man named Abraham to whom he promised a child through whom he would fulfil the covenant ("the child of promise," Genesis 15). Abraham had no children from his wife Sarah, who was barren, and the covenant became a most valuable and special promise to him.

It was said that only a miracle would work, yet Sarah interfered when conscious of her condition, offered her maidservant Hagar to Abraham to conceive and bear the child. Abraham agreed to take Hagar as his concubine and she shortly after conceived and bore Ishmael (Genesis 16).

God allowed Ishmael to be born but he was not the child of promise God had in mind (Genesis 17).

God promised a child through Sarah and not Hagar (Genesis 17-18) , and God fulfilled His promise. "And the Lord visited Sarah as He had said, and the Lord did for Sarah as He had spoken. For Sarah conceived and bore Abraham a son in his old age, at the set time of which God had spoken to him. And Abraham called the name of his son who was born to him-whom Sarah bore to him-isaac"

(Genesis 21:1-3)

Isaac was the child of promise. Isaac later begot Jacob, the father of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, and the Messiah, Jesus Christ, eventually came into the world through the nation of Israel, fulfilling the covenant which God had made with Abraham.

God also promised to give the land of Canaan (Palestine) to Isaac's descendants, the land which Israel possesses today (Genesis 12:4-7; 13:12-18; 15:1-21; 17:1-22; 21:1-14; 25:19-26; 26:1-6; 35:9-12).

For Muslims the problem starts with the Quran teaching that Ishmael was the child of promise and not Isaac, therefore Muslims believe that God's covenant promises were meant for Ishmael's descendants which include Muhammad.

Muslims lay claim to these covenant promises including the lands of Palestine.

This also makes it difficult for Muslims as Ishmael and his half brother Isaac were Jews after Abraham their father.




Tens of thousands killed for refusing to join  saudi financed jihad. Children raped and sold into sex slavery as permitted under islam. Women executed if refusing to become prositiutes for jihadi fighters.

IRAQ and SYRIA are the prime example of modern Islam in action


There is such a huge variety of utter nonsense written about women and Islam, all of which overlooks the reality of exactly what the place of a woman is in Islam..NOT what they fantasize it as being, but the reality.

Women are held as subservient to man. FACT

Women are set as having a financial and social value. FACT.

Women can be stoned to death and are, for any accusations made against them, without proof. FACT.

The list goes on. And those that say it is untrue, just look at the historic and daily reporting where women are killed, scarred, prevented from having education and beaten all in the name of Islam. Then defended as being just and so written in the Quran!

Quran (4:34) - "Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them."

Quran (2:228) - "and the men are a degree above them"

Quran (33:59) - "Tell thy wives and thy daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks close round them..." Men determine how women dress.

Quran (33:33) - "And abide quietly in your homes..." Women are confined to their homes except when they have permission to go out.

Quran (2:223) - "Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will." Wives are to be sexually available to their husbands in all ways at all times. They serve their husbands at his command. This verse is believed to refer to anal sex (see Bukhari 60:51), and was "revealed" when women complained to Muhammad about the practice. The phrase "when and how you will" means that they lost their case.

Quran (66:5) - "Maybe, his Lord, if he divorce you, will give him in your place wives better than you, submissive, faithful, obedient, penitent, adorers, fasters, widows and virgins" A disobedient wife can be replaced.


Again it is claimed to be against the teachings of Islam. However, The Quran contains over 108 written verses which demands that Muslims go to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule.

The verses are not vague either, with graphic and specific commands to cut off heads, limbs and fingers and to kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.

The introduction of a moral code known as Sharia, or Islamic law, is the religious legal system governing the members of the Islamic faith.

It is derived from the religious precepts of Islam, particularly the Quran and the Hadith. The term sharia comes from the Arabic language term sharīʿah, which means a body of moral and religious law derived from religious prophecy, as opposed to human legislation.

Sharia has no process of appeal or mitigation, as to many, it would be the same as questioning the Quran.

Sharia is only ever possible when part of the Islamic governance of a nation, however, it has in places such as the USA and UK, been introduced in parts of the country where Muslims are present in numbers.

This is in complete opposition to the laws of the land as has developed under democracy, yet the multicultural supporters fail to see the problems of citizens no longer protected by National laws in favour of imported laws for minorities.

Commonly, we have been told by Muslims that they and their forefathers had left their Islamic lands because of their inability to be Muslims and be in modernity. A conflict that in recent years has seen Islam reverting to an unrecognisable and primitive form of control via Islam, which is alien to all those that seek to me Muslim, yet live in a modern, developed world with uniformed laws.

A fact for ALL those Muslims that have moved to the West (democratic and free), is that practising religion has always been part of living in a free society which most have sought. Yet, following acceptance into their society, they often will demand special treatment such as Sharia, Hijab and rights which infringe upon the society into which they have chosen to live.

Where Muslims demand to be held under Sharia in the West, they never want to be punished accordingly, i.e hands cut off for theft or stoning and execution.

At that point they demand western laws and justice. Is this hypocrisy and a clear sign of cherry picking the ‘useful and beneficial’ part of the faith? Of course it is

Why would anyone fleeing an Islamic nation with Sharia law, then support Sharia?

ANSWER = They are NOT asylum seekers but economic migrants

Under Sadam Hussein, Iraq was stable. Multiple faiths existed and were protected, including the 8% of Christians. The USA dancing to the SAUDI tune of oil money as always, soon ended what was a regional issue and created global instability with Islamic terrorism at the core.

While Iraq obeyed the USA, it was a vast source of income and oil. Saudi Arabia did not favour this co-operation and possibly believed the American people would believe that IRAQ was involved in 9/11, and so the Saudi men launched their attacks. Perhaps president Bush also believed the people would listen to him, as did his war mongering friend prime minister Tony Blair (now confirmed as a liar of the iraq facts on which to to go war, CHILCOT REPORT).

Islam has become a religion in whose name some of the worst atrocities have been committed against humanity in modern times. Without Saudi Billions, this would certainly not have been the case and perhaps we would be living in peace.

Indeed, we have been told NOT to print anything critical.

Yet we shall be adding to this site the REAL history of Islam, within the next few months.


There was a brief but remarkable period refered to as The Islamic Golden Age

Believed to have started around 786, it would last until the 13th century and was a period when Islam was ruled by a number of Caliphates, during which time the development of Science, Mathematics, Philosophy, Medicine and Islamic culture flourished at a remarkable rate.

It seems that despite being ruled as a Caliphate, there was clear freedom of thought and practice to experiment and trial during this period, without reference to the Quran to prevent such developments.

Both under Islam and Christianity, there came a period when any efforts of development across all the Sciences, was regarded as heracy.Unfortunately across various interpretations of Islam, we have seen the wide-spread destruction of historiical wonders and art, all claiming to be somehow an affront to Islam and demanding execution of those responsible. Indeed, a similar act was conducted in Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, taking back the citizens of that country to the dark ages and even renaming the time period to year 0.

Such actions it is agreed by most scholars, is no more than a control tool.

The Taliban in Afghanistan were not interested in the reality of Islam as a religion and a faith by which people can live in peace. They used the verses from the 8th century to control and kill ‘anyone’, there were no exceptions beyond the actual ‘management’, and thousands were killed for no reason other than to instill fear to the point of terror. All artwork and statues were destroyed in the name of Islam, including the ancient and huge Bamiyan Buddhas carved into a mountainside.


Here-in lies the most dangerous points to the way that Islam is being used and interpreted. From Clerics to Scholars and high ranking Imams, they seem content in using the faith as a tool of control. Once the wealth of Saudi Arabis is taken aboard, it becomes a weapon against the people themselves, with which to justify any and all manner of barbarism.

It is no wonder that the ‘outside’ world wants little to do wiith us! It is impossible for them and us, to win.

Support one side or a government, and the opposition will become your enemy, do not support them and they will become your enemy, support the opposition and....

Rather than building Islam as a religion of peace and love, it has become one of sectarianism amongst Muslims and hatred towards non Muslims that must be converted or killed according to the Saudi doctrine.

Turkey is a prime example of failure as a  ‘free’ state with a portion of its citizens of Muslim faith.

As a puppet of Saudi Arabia, TURKEY, the instigators of

the most savage period of Islam under the Ottoman Empire, and yet again

have again turned to the weapon of Islam with the financial support of their Saudi masters

As a result, all Muslims end up suffering the effects.

Unfortunately, as military spending by Saudi Arabia is in the billions of dollars each year, events such as the New York 9/11 attack and the rolling ISIS - DAESH - ISIL - ISLAMIC STATE  terror campaigns and many more, are never blamed on those who were at the heart of the planning and funding, i.e Saudi Arabia.

Wars and uprisings funded and armed by Saudi Arabia in the name of Islam has done nothing but create the reality of Islam being a religion of terror.

It is not ISLAM which is opposed by peoples around the world, but the way in which it is commonly introduced and the dangers it holds. Indeed, non Muslim countries where Muslims live, are regularly seeing Muslim kill Muslim because of them being the ‘wrong’ Muslim!  This is even before the major terror acts and the implosion of the Middle East in the name of Islamic sectarianism.

Muslims had lived across Europe as individuals in peace long before before the invasion and occupation of Spain, Croatia, Balkans and the Kingdom of Hungary.

800 years in Spain yet eventually ousted!

150 years in Hungary yet eventuatlly pushed out!

Historically ISLAM has never been accepted by the people of Europe. And while Muslims were living and working in peace, the Islamic rulers and Caliphates wanted to forever defeat Europe and introduce Islam by force.

As a result, Muslims under the patronage of Saudi Arabia have been trying to force Islam onto the people of Europe by violence and fear

Europeans have never responded to force by fear, which is in total contrast to the Arab world and poverty scored regions.

The damage caused by Islam through the middle ages as an invading force has not been learnt from. Few Muslims are European, the majority being immigrants. Islam does not exist in any numbers without the emmigration of Muslims.

A Muslim cannot expect to be treated as a part of the society into which they have moved, if they are allowed to practice their faith but demand major parts of the Islam from which they originally ‘claimed’ to have fled!

Muslims will never live in acceptance in their Western society whilst are supported and protected by liberal governments which immediately jump to their defence for acts of terror.

Of course all Muslims are not terrorists, yet a very large portion do support terrorism in the name of Islam. Muslims accept that acts of terror are perpetrated by Muslims and supported by other Muslims and Mosques.

Having Western governments automatically run to the defence of Muslims whenever an act of Terror is committed in the name of Islam, only isolates all Muslims further. Not by the accusations, but by the ‘do not blame all Muslim’ banner of the liberals.

Saudi Arabia has been both accused and proven to be the financiers of terror, the funding party of terror, the backers of terror.

They are known to be behind all main Islamic terror groups including Islamic State / Daesh / Isis, Al-Qaeda, Al Nusra,  including terror groups in Chechnya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and in numerous other States and countries via ‘charitable’ giving, Mosques and Schools.

Whilst the West funds terrorism by trading with Saudi Arabia and giving them the money with which they have killed tens of thousands of people over 45 years,  Islam as a faith or social experiment have failed completely and will never be anything but the ‘religion’ of terror. This can no longer be rejected by imams or Scholars, not when killing one another in the name of Islam is their only aim!

Do not allow Islam to be destroyed by Saudi backed terror!

If you do…do not blame others for hating Muslims and Islam..they are not to blame.

Islamic Scholars may argue that Islam was not a religion but a socio-policital movement, just as Shia, Sunni or the 70+ other branches may argue how theirs was the true one. In the end it make no difference when one is killing the other and when anyone accused of offending Islam is them also killed. That then is no longer any movement or religion, but a cult built on fear!  Yet, in the middle of 20th century, Islam had settled to non murderous violence and was considered as a major religion.  Now? What has become of Islam? A cartoon results in muders whilst suicide killers blowing up a mosque are considerd martyrs.  Yet these cannot be excused as the acts of primitive barbarians living i the stone-age, as many had and are educated in the West and of wealthy families. This leaves little alternative as an excuse other than that current Islam is one which promotes the killing of innocence as part of its core belief.  Indeed, Al-Qaeda, Isil / Daesh, Saudi Arabia, Turkey,Taliban +++, all promote murder in the name of Islam. So again, What happened?